| If this email does not display correctly please click here or paste the following link into your internet browser: http://retailmerchants.com/newsletter-retail-advocate/2010-03-10.htm |
||||
![]() |
||||
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Staying on Top of the Hill: Week 7There are five critical retail issues now in the hands of budget conferees (Senators & Delegates chosen to negotiate the budget or legislation where there is no agreement between the House and Senate). The following important issues are in conference: 1. Dealer DiscountThe House budget provides a fifty percent reduction in the Dealer Discount for all retailers who are not required to report electronically their monthly remittance. Those retailers who do report electronically would receive no Dealer Discount. The Senate budget provides no dealer discount, but suspends the dealer discount for this budget cycle. The Senate does direct the Department of Taxation to meet with retailers during the summer and develop a recommendation for providing a dealer discount to retailers; the report is due to the Governor by October 1, 2010. 2. Accelerated Sales Tax PaymentThe Senate and House budgets contain an accelerated sales tax payment for those retailers with $1million or more in annual taxable sales. This would require retailers to estimate their sales based on the previous year’s June sales and remit the estimated tax on the 25th of June. The retailer would be paying taxes they have yet to collect. VRF is opposing any form of accelerated tax payment. This “gimmick” was used during Governor Warner’s administration and at that time many retailers had to obtain loans to meet the estimated tax payment. Unfortunately during the present economy, many banks are reluctant to give loans. 3. Amazon Loophole Budget LanguageThe Senate budget amendment that contains language to close the loophole that exempts internet retailers who use affiliates (commissioned agents) in the Commonwealth is still in the Senate budget. Your VRF lobbyists are working with budget conferees to keep this amendment. Not only does the amendment bring uncollected tax revenue to the Commonwealth, it helps level the playing field for all retailers. 4. Weights and MeasuresA funding solution in the Senate budget to add one tenth of one cent to fuel cost at the rack was offered by the Virginia Petroleum Convenience and Grocery Association. This solution would fund the entire Weights and Measures program, thus removing the proposed $17.50 per measuring device that was put in the budget by former Governor Kaine. It is yet to be determined if the House will accept this solution. VRF appreciates the efforts of the VPCGA to offer this solution that helps all retailers. 5. District and Circuit Courts; increases in court feesVRF has opposed SB 329, increasing fees in both district and circuit courts from (i) $27 to $75 in a district court civil action and (ii) the current scale of $60-$160 to $500-$1,000 in civil actions in circuit court. The fee increases under this bill in district court are allocated to the sheriffs' departments and the increases in circuit court are split between the sheriffs' (85%) and the commonwealth attorneys' (15%) offices to be used exclusively for achieving the current staffing standards of the two constitutional offices. The $10 fee for the Courts Technology Fund is removed from civil cases. The Fund still receives fees applicable to other filings in the circuit and appellate courts. The bill has not been heard in the House Court of Justice Committee but is included in the Senate version of the budget. Click here to view the letter sent to budget conferees to express the VRF position or support for the above issues. The letter was authored by Margaret Ballard on behalf of VRF. Other Legislative UpdateIn the past week HB1010 that dealt with the definition of gambling passed the Senate with a substitute. The VRF concern dealt with games used as promotional events. The final substitute did clarify that retailers who had promotions that offered game pieces to participate in the promotion would not be considered gambling as long as game pieces would be provided with or without a purchase. To view legislation that passed click here. To view legislation that failed click here. To view legislation that was carried over until next session click here.
|
|
|||
| Copyright ©2010 Retail Merchants Association. All Rights Reserved. | ||||